LaCroix isn’t French — it’s Wisconsin.

LaCroix’s number-one branding fact is a delightful misdirection: despite the fancy French-looking name, it’s not French at all. LaCroix was introduced around 1980–81 by the G. Heileman Brewing Company of La Crosse, Wisconsin (a beer company), and the name — French for “the cross” — is a nod to La Crosse / the St. Croix River. Crucially, it’s pronounced “luh-CROY” (rhyming with “the coy”), the American St. Croix pronunciation, not the French “la-KWAH.” Getting that right — a humble Midwestern ex-brewery brand, not a chic import — is the essential correction for any LaCroix piece. (Honest caveats: the exact intro year is inconsistent across sources, 1980 vs 1981; and no official brand hex or wordmark typeface is published, so colours and type here are approximate.)

For decades LaCroix was a quiet regional sparkling water — until it became a cultural phenomenon. The takeoff dates to spring 2015, when US soda sales hit a 30-year low and health-conscious millennials embraced LaCroix as a fun, zero-calorie, zero-sweetener alternative. Owner National Beverage leaned hard into social media, and the brand exploded into a genuine millennial icon with a cult following.

The engine of that cult status is the can design: bold, brightly coloured, flavour-coded and unapologetically busy — a look often described (in the press) as “90s-retro” or “clip-art-y,” and just as often called iconic. Here’s the key design fact: this aesthetic came from a 2002 rebrand by National Beverage, and it was reportedly the direction “least favored by management” — but it won with consumers “in a landslide.” That polarizing, colourful, un-precious look became the brand’s signature (and a case study in trusting the audience over internal taste). On ownership: LaCroix is owned by National Beverage Corporation (led by Nick Caporella). Wisconsin fizz that became a mood.

LaCroix lives in a rainbow of cans. Click a swatch to copy the hex.

LaCroix’s palette is a bright, flavour-coded rainbow — each flavour gets its own vivid colour (hot pink, teal, orange, lime, purple and more), splashed across a busy, colourful can. It’s a joyful, energetic, un-precious scheme that stands out on the shelf and makes the range fun to collect and Instagram. The brightness and variety are central to the brand’s millennial appeal: the cans are cheerful, casual and shareable, the opposite of austere premium water. The honest caveat: LaCroix publishes no official public brand hex — the rainbow colours here are approximations, not a confirmed spec.

The lesson is a bright, flavour-coded palette that stands out by being un-precious. LaCroix’s busy, colourful cans win precisely because they’re fun and unfussy — not sleek and minimal. For designers, it’s a reminder that a bold, even polarizing, colourful look can build a cult following, and that consumer preference can beat internal taste. The takeaways: use a bright, flavour-coded palette to make a range fun and collectible; don’t fear a bold, un-precious look if the audience loves it (the 2002 rebrand); and treat specific hexes as approximate when no official spec is published.

The wordmark is a splashy, bold sans — fun and casual.

LaCroix’s splashy, bold wordmark is fun and casual — a colourful, lively treatment (often with a little splash motif) that reads as playful, energetic and unpretentious, matching the busy rainbow cans and the brand’s millennial, social-media personality. It’s the opposite of premium minimalism: cheerful, a bit retro, and totally un-precious, which is exactly why it connected with a generation tired of both sugary soda and austere luxury water. (Because the lettering is custom and no official typeface is documented, the honest description is “a splashy, bold sans,” not a named font.) The type behaves like the brand: fun, casual and colourful — fizzy water as a good mood.

LaCroix won by embracing a look management doubted.

LaCroix is a lesson in trusting the audience over internal taste. Its now-iconic look — bold, busy, colourful, a little “clip-art” — was, by the company’s own account, the direction management liked least, yet it won with consumers in a landslide in the 2002 rebrand, and went on to power the brand’s 2015 millennial explosion. That’s a powerful design lesson: what a boardroom finds tasteful and what an audience finds fun and shareable are often different, and betting on the latter can build a cult brand. LaCroix’s success is inseparable from its willingness to be bold and un-precious.

For designers and brand-builders, LaCroix offers a clear takeaway: listen to the audience, and don’t fear a bold, un-precious look. The lessons: consumer preference can beat internal “good taste” (the 2002 rebrand management doubted but consumers loved); a fun, colourful, shareable identity can build a cult following (the millennial boom); and a strong, ownable look matters more than being sleek. It’s also a reminder to keep the facts precise — LaCroix is from La Crosse, Wisconsin (an ex-brewery, G. Heileman, around 1980–81), pronounced “luh-CROY,” not French; the boom dates to spring 2015; the colourful can look came from a 2002 rebrand; and it’s owned by National Beverage. LaCroix trusted its audience — proof that betting on what people love can build a cult brand.

Keep LaCroix’s identity on hand — save it to a board in the Made Good inspiration library.