Reebok Brand Guidelines
A brand named after an African antelope — and a logo it left, then returned to, in search of itself.
An abstract leaping arc — the antelope idea, not the Vector. Deliberately not the Reebok mark.
Named after an antelope
Reebok’s name comes from a fast African animal.
Reebok’s name has a lovely, unexpected origin: it comes from “rhebok” (in a US spelling) — a grey rhebok, a swift, graceful African antelope. It’s a fitting choice for an athletic brand: an antelope suggests speed, agility and lightness, exactly the qualities a running-shoe company wants to evoke. The company’s roots go back further than the name, though: it traces to J.W. Foster and Sons, a British firm founded in 1895 in Bolton that made spiked running shoes; the grandsons Joe and Jeff Foster renamed the company Reebok in 1958. So there’s a genuine, deep athletic heritage — over a century of running shoes — behind the animal name. Our homage nods to that antelope with an abstract leaping arc, not the Vector logo.
The Vector and the Delta
Reebok’s logo history is a story of leaving and returning.
Reebok’s identity has an instructive, slightly turbulent recent history. Its long-standing symbol is the “Vector” — a dynamic, slashing, flag-like mark suggesting speed and movement, introduced around 1986 (replacing an earlier Union Jack mark that honoured its British roots). Then, around 2014, Reebok made a bold pivot toward fitness and CrossFit and introduced a completely different logo: the “Delta,” a triangle representing the change an athlete goes through. But the Delta didn’t stick as a total replacement, and in 2019 Reebok returned to a refreshed Vector for its main brand (keeping the Delta on some fitness lines). That round trip — abandoning a heritage mark, then coming back to it — is a real-world lesson in the risk of walking away from established brand equity.
The cost of changing course
Reebok’s logo saga echoes the cautionary tales.
Reebok’s experience is a companion to the rebrand cautionary tales elsewhere in this series (Gap, Tropicana). The 2014 switch to the Delta had a genuine strategic rationale — a real repositioning toward fitness — but it meant walking away from decades of recognition built up in the Vector. When the fitness pivot didn’t play out as hoped and the brand refocused, returning to the Vector was effectively an acknowledgment that the established symbol’s accumulated equity was too valuable to abandon. It’s a reminder that a logo isn’t just a graphic to be swapped when strategy shifts; it’s a store of recognition and meaning that takes decades to build and can be squandered quickly. Reebok learned, at some cost, that abandoning a well-known mark is a serious decision — and that sometimes the right move after a detour is simply to come home.
Heritage worth returning to
Reebok’s story shows the pull of established identity.
Underneath the logo turbulence, Reebok has a strong, authentic foundation: a real athletic heritage stretching back to 1895, an evocative name drawn from a fast antelope, and in the Vector a distinctive, dynamic mark with real recognition. The recent history — leaving the Vector and then returning to it — ultimately underscores the value of that established identity: the brand found its way back to the symbol that carried the most meaning.
The broad lesson is about respecting the equity in an existing mark, even while pursuing new strategic directions. Reebok’s pivot to fitness was a reasonable business bet, but the branding lesson is that heritage assets like the Vector are hard-won and shouldn’t be discarded lightly — because if you walk away and later need them back, you’ve spent years diluting recognition you then have to rebuild. The most durable path is usually to evolve a strong existing mark to fit new ambitions rather than replace it wholesale. Reebok’s round trip from Vector to Delta and back is a live demonstration of that principle: a century-old heritage brand, an antelope’s name, a dynamic slashing logo — assets worth returning to. The company rediscovered that its identity was more valuable kept than reinvented, which is a lesson every brand tempted by a dramatic rebrand would do well to remember.
Type & the wordmark
Bold, athletic, dynamic lettering.
Reebok’s wordmark is bold and athletic — dynamic lettering that pairs with the Vector. The specimen below stands in with a strong sans.
Be more human
Bold, athletic, dynamic — type with the motion of a leaping antelope. (Specimen set in Archivo, a neutral stand-in.)
Red & navy
A bold Vector red, with navy. Click a swatch to copy the hex.
Reebok’s palette leans on a bold red #E4002B (Vector red) with a classic navy #002F6C, plus grey and white. Lead with red and navy below.
Explore & save
Keep the antelope idea on hand — save the leaping homage and the palette to a board.
Reebok identity set
Pin the leaping-arc homage, the red-and-navy palette and the leave-then-return lesson to your own board.



